🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.